Sunday 7 October 2012

A nation addicted to pain

 
 
 
"Hate-mongers play a central role in our electronic and print media and have a vast following online. They spread their hatred based on half-cooked conspiracy theories"
Addiction can be vaguely described as a persistent and compulsive dependence on a substance or behaviour. Pain on the other hand can be defined as an unpleasant physical and psychological sensation, which can range from mild and localised discomfort to agony. The word pain originates from Latin, where poena means a fine or penalty.

What does this have to do with us? When you put the two together, it seems to highlight clearly our current state of affairs. As a nation, we have repeatedly over the years indulged in compulsive acts of self-inflicted harm, each time increasing the intensity of it, so that we get more ‘buzz from every hit.’ We cannot live without this pain and we seem to continue harbouring this behaviour despite the knowledge of the harm that comes from it. When we do not have any sensational or harmful event going on, we become concerned and agitated, showing signs of withdrawal and to have an immediate relief from these symptoms we cook up bizarre and erratic conspiracy theories to calm down and satisfy our spasmodic brain. Such behaviour carries the hallmark of a ‘dependence syndrome’.
Because of this dependence, we need pain to survive and wake ourselves up every morning pushing to function barely, only to realise that soon the effect wears off and we would need another dose just to avoid slipping into an impassive slumber. If we analyse the current political, economic and social climate of Pakistan, it seems we have been here before many times, with each successive episode being worse than the previous one. We remain confused as a nation, having not even agreed on the type and form of governance we prefer. When there is civilian autocracy (aka democracy) we yearn for a dictatorship and once we get what we wish for, some years later, we pour out on the streets like bloodthirsty vampires demanding a return to the status quo. We praise ad nauseam a faith-based system in a neighbouring war-torn deprived country, but when it raises its ugly head in our country, we shiver with fear. As we continue to lead our daily mundane lives in the current system, no opportunity is passed without blaming the ‘Satan-inspired’ way of life for our daily troubles and sporadic but regular catastrophes. The sooner we put an end to all this confusion the better it is for us. Generally, religion should not become solely a state affair and be used to gain popularity by elected and unelected individuals. Faith should not be used by the media to improve their ratings, earn profits or provide cheap entertainment by showing live televised conversions. Minorities should cease to be minorities as per Mohammed Ali Jinnah’s vision for Pakistan. Ideologies should not be used to guide democracy. They should remain a part of political manifestos. A democratic process and setup should be robust enough to filter out the undemocratic aspect of ideologies if they do manage to come to power.

But the question remains, how do we inflict pain on ourselves? Any action that leads to the deliberate disruption of society can be considered as harm to self. A street protest against others, becoming violent and aggressive, leading to destruction of our own assets, is a common example. Most politicians have a divisive agenda with short-term gains. Hence they start riding the popular bandwagon, when actually they should step back and try to make sense of the whole situation before resorting to fuelling the emotional rhetoric. We further damage ourselves by teaching our children distorted historical facts through our textbooks, creating a whole generation that is incapable of free thinking, which follows a national narrative when it comes to understanding our neighbours and the world around us. We dislike being stereotyped but love to stereotype others. Hate-mongers play a central role in our electronic and print media and have a vast following online. They spread their hatred based on half-cooked conspiracy theories and circumstantial facts and anyone challenging their claims is either labelled as an unpatriotic traitor or literally ‘taught a lesson or two’.
Apart from the general populace, our national institutions also confound the problem. Any institution, when given power and supported by the masses, starts behaving like an uncontrolled venomous snake that starts stinging everything around it, only to realise later on that the behaviour only leads to a destruction of its own habitat. Emotional rhetoric should not be used to guide our domestic and international policies and neither should it be used by our institutions to pass important landmark bills and/or judgements. There should be a debate reaching some consensus before important decisions are made. Corruption and nepotism plague us all, including our institutions, from parliament to the judiciary to the security establishment. This remains the biggest cause of harm to us. We all like to change the world around us but struggle to change ourselves as the first step.

We should focus on our strengths and abilities. We are a very philanthropic nation. Not many countries can boast free charitable organisations that range from education to health and much more. We need to be patient and let the system (whichever we choose it to be) take its due course. Government and the people need to focus on essential elements and prioritise our resources on things that will guarantee our survival in the long run. The following three things should be developed aggressively and should remain on the government’s agenda regardless of who comes to power: education, communication and health. Once we have created inroads in these three domains we can then start restructuring the economy. Once we achieve a position in the global economy, our investments in other countries will create the so-called ‘strategic depth’ and not the shenanigans of the deep state. I am a strong believer in people (a collection of which makes a nation) and their ability to recover and rehabilitate. Can we do it? Yes we can!
 
This article was first published on Daily Times Newspaper, Pakistan on 3rd October 2012:
 
 
 
Disclaimer: I have used the picture from the internet which was freely available and do not have copyright to it. If i am infringing any copyrights please let me know and the picture will me taken off immediately.


4 comments:

  1. Dear Sir,

    As always, I immensely enjoyed digesting your latest contribution which, in true form, provides:

    1. food for thought (in respect of an ailing nation of hungry, malnourished and starving masses);

    2. bright reflection (in respect of a beleaguered nation, led by utter dim-wits and dumb asses......apologies to the wider donkey genus for insulting their relative noble heritage);

    3. plausible illuminated pathways (in respect of a misled nation, in both metaphorical and literal darkness.............NO further elaboration needed);

    4. cautious hope (in a despondent nation, largely inhabited by a now hopeless peoples and communities).........or should this point read: it may be more apt to be hopefully cautious?

    Now that I've made some relatively positive commentary....

    Pls see next commentary box for continuation.


    Mmmia.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With all the sincere will in the world, I am afraid that you have got it completely upside-down (which, given, The Nation in question, has become the norm..........can't see the wood for the trees phenomenon).

    I agree, The Nation is predominantly *dominated/populated/led (*delete as appropriate) by: sadistic, masochistic, nihilistic, parasitic, socio-paths, who are unable /unwilling to see beyond the ends of their collective noses or beyond the pursuit of self-interest(s).

    All this talk about 'change': aren't things bad enough already. This is precisely the Pakistan Paradox: in a constant state of uncertain and unpredictable flux. Yet, at the same time, being, "...patient and let[ting] the system...take its due course", is akin to an anatomically dysmorphic Ostrich burying it's head into a railway track (bear with me) when its' eyes are actually in its' buttocks and the train of life (carrying every Pakistani on its already over-burdened carriages) is hurtling uncontrollably and inevitably - at three hundred and thirty metres per second - towards said Ostrich's back-side.
    Convoluted (and somewhat 'schizophrenic') analogy but, forgive me, so is the subject nation.

    In the case of The Nation, maintaining laissez faire and thereby facilitating "...due course" will invariably lead only to 'due destruction'.

    Who could disagree with your suggested priorities for the ailing nation: "...education, communication and health": all laudable aspirations for any striving civilised nation/society. However, this is not just any striving nation, it is also a wounded and healing nation, one which, as you so clearly illustrate in your article, is repeatedly, perpetually and incessantly wounding and healing itself in real time. Another painful paradox. In a nation of paradoxes.

    "How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress"
    [Professor Niels Henrik Bohr, Danish physicist, Nobel Prize winner, 1922].


    Pls see next commentary box for continuation.


    Mmmia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would argue that The Nation has more pressing priorities which are fundamentally necessary before it can even begin to think about (relative) 'luxuries' such as education, communication and health (-here, I am reminded of Maslow's hierarchy, as we are elementally dealing with a nation 'who' is essentially fighting for its' very survival). In the case of Pakistan, I propose that first priorities should be: security, safety, rule of law, criminal justice and, acutely, social justice. I have deliberately included all these as separate (yet related) entities (as policy agendas for any sane government) but one could argue that these five could easily be subsumed into three (or even two). However, each has it's own meaning, significance and merits. Almost by definition, The Republic of Pakistan (like any other sovereign nation state) needs secure and controlled borders and a free and independent military (including military intelligence).

    The average (if only there were such a thing in Pakistan) man, woman, child and stray dog should be able to go about his/her daily business (-if indeed he is fortunate enough to possess such a thing as secure, gainful employment /means of income - links into social justice) without fear, insecurity or persecution. At the end of his/her day, as darkness falls, that (fictitious /factitious) average man/woman should be able to rest his/her weary head on a pillow, sleep in peace (not with one - or both - eyes open) and look forward to waking up alive and well in the morning so that he/she can meaningfully contribute to society and the nation state in whatever he/she does.

    Yes, it is absolutely the responsibility and job of Government /The Law /Authorities to facilitate and enable such an optimistic, fantastic and utopic reality. And, yes, I did include stray dogs in my agenda for social and moral justice. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi said (transliterated): 'We can judge the state of a nation's morals by the way it treats its' animals'. Enough said.

    If only Pakistan was a nation of 'averages', that would be just great. It would be doing very well indeed if Pakistan was average at everything it did/does/has. Alas, nothing could be further from the harsh reality: The Nation is one of extreme extremes, of haves and have-nots, of sheer desperation, utter indifference; human souls holding out, hoping, that there is, somewhere - there must be, has to be - Hope.

    You go on to say that, "Once we have created inroads in these three domains [education, communication and health] we can then start restructuring the economy". Now, this is the 'upside-down' thing (referred to earlier): The whole point is that literal and physical Roads are needed to make (metaphorical and literal) In-roads.
    Infra-structure is the key pre-cursor to Re-structuring: restructuring the Economy, Education, Communication and Health. The solution was there in your proposition: inroads.

    "Every great and deep difficulty bears in itself its own solution. It forces us to change our thinking in order to find it"
    [Professor Niels Henrik Bohr, Danish physicist, Nobel Prize winner, 1922].


    Pls see next commentary box for continuation.


    Mmmia.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I too am a strong believer in people. But not 'power to the people', that just leads to mob-rule and the cessation of proper law and order. People need to be led; we need honest, morally upright and courageous leaders; we need proper, effective and efficient leadership.

    "A collection" of people does not, unfortunately, make a Nation. It just makes a bunch of people (hence, mob-rule). What can turn a bunch of people, however, into a Nation state (if they so desire - that's a separate point) is, amongst other things: shared goals, common values, mutual interests, understanding, tolerance and shared vision.

    Yes, in order to have any real hope of any kind of desirable future, The Nation needs "to recover and rehabilitate". Your question, "Can we do it?", is indeed an appropriate one. However, I would argue that any possible answer to such a challenging question should be conditional and begin with the word "IF". As you will know only too well, in order for any individual to embark upon a successful journey of sustained recovery and rehabilitation, he must first come to terms with what he has done, or, more fundamentally, what he IS. Or, put somewhat theatrically, face up to his 'demons'.

    We might call this process (as it is not a eureka moment) Acceptance OR Insight OR Realisation OR Reality-confrontation. I am not fond of the word confrontation and I realise that I have misappropriated it here (as we are thankfully not bound by ICD or DSM) but I think that that is precisely the type of 'therapy'that The Nation needs in this period of critical malady and malaise..... Confrontation. The people/Nation/society/communities would indeed benefit if only it began it's journey by confronting the realities of both it's past and it's present.

    Then, and only then, can The Nation begin the long, arduous and forbearing journey of self-discovery via recovery and rehabilitation.

    Yours,

    Mmmia.

    ReplyDelete